Re: Anyone using P and O Ferries this summer?
No it isnt. No loophole. They just did the cost/benefit analysis and decided to drive a coach and horses through the employment law requirements because some halfwit told them that was the best approach
They knew it was wrong and knew the cost, they just figured it was one worth paying. (See also: Putin; sanctions)
They are wrong ( see also: Putin; sanctions). Many b2c business and many b2b businesses are changing the way they do stuff like this. They cost in public perception and reputational damage and increasingly, they actually want to display morality at a corporate level. This cuts across environmental policy, employment,tax strategy etc. It's not just lip service, this sort of thing is embedded in corporate culture in a way that it just wasn't a decade ago.
Originally posted by life on mars
View Post
They knew it was wrong and knew the cost, they just figured it was one worth paying. (See also: Putin; sanctions)
They are wrong ( see also: Putin; sanctions). Many b2c business and many b2b businesses are changing the way they do stuff like this. They cost in public perception and reputational damage and increasingly, they actually want to display morality at a corporate level. This cuts across environmental policy, employment,tax strategy etc. It's not just lip service, this sort of thing is embedded in corporate culture in a way that it just wasn't a decade ago.

Comment