Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GLAMMY

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: GLAMMY

    doing our best to throw this game away

    Comment


    • Re: GLAMMY

      what's the opposite of streetwise? 'cos that's what this lot are!

      Comment


      • Re: GLAMMY

        Please don't bugger this up! Need a good partnership after tea to settle the nerves

        Comment


        • Re: GLAMMY

          Byrom and Rootcomfortably bat out for the draw - meanwhile, Leicestershire, chasing 380odd at Headingley look like they’re going to beat Yorkshire.

          Comment


          • Re: GLAMMY

            Very much a City at London Rd performance.

            Comment


            • Re: GLAMMY

              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
              Byrom and Rootcomfortably bat out for the draw - meanwhile, Leicestershire, chasing 380odd at Headingley look like they’re going to beat Yorkshire.
              It was a very good season opener, Gloucester ducked out of setting a target with the hope of winning.

              If Stokes had been their captain we would have had a game.

              What if you lose the first game of the season in a good tussle? There's been too much negative cricket in the longer game, and this was an example of it.

              Comment


              • Re: GLAMMY

                Originally posted by rich munn View Post
                It was a very good season opener, Gloucester ducked out of setting a target with the hope of winning.

                If Stokes had been their captain we would have had a game.

                What if you lose the first game of the season in a good tussle? There's been too much negative cricket in the longer game, and this was an example of it.
                There was an article on whether counties would be adapting "Bazball" ...obviously Gloucester did not get the memo and stuck to let's make sure we can't lose declaration

                Comment


                • Re: GLAMMY

                  loks like bbc sport has removed the draw from the tables

                  Comment


                  • Re: GLAMMY

                    Originally posted by poc View Post
                    loks like bbc sport has removed the draw from the tables
                    Changed rules this year only 5pts for draw.
                    Batting 250 1pt to 450 5pts

                    Comment


                    • Re: GLAMMY

                      Originally posted by rich munn View Post
                      It was a very good season opener, Gloucester ducked out of setting a target with the hope of winning.

                      If Stokes had been their captain we would have had a game.

                      What if you lose the first game of the season in a good tussle? There's been too much negative cricket in the longer game, and this was an example of it.
                      Isn’t there some sort of unwritten ancient cricket lore about you don’t set opponents who put you in to bat a realistic target via a declaration or am I imaging it?

                      Comment


                      • Re: GLAMMY

                        I think Gloucester should rightly be proud of a draw. To overcome a 239 run deficit on first innings and not lose is an achievement. I love attacking cricket, but the draw is also a legitimate cricket result.

                        I do find it a bit strange the way they approached the innings mind. Played very aggressively late on Saturday, as if they were setting up for setting us a total to chase, then didn't really do it. They almost took the risk, but didn't chase the reward

                        Comment


                        • Re: GLAMMY

                          Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                          Isn’t there some sort of unwritten ancient cricket lore about you don’t set opponents who put you in to bat a realistic target via a declaration or am I imaging it?
                          I played a couple of three day games many moons ago and what you said Bob is correct. I remember asking Barry Lloyd if we’re going to try and set the opposition some sort of chase for maybe the final three hour on the final afternoon.He told me that as they had batted for 125 overs and had gone for bowling us out twice going for an innings victory, once we had made the game safe, there was no way that we would declare to give them a sniff. That apparently was the way 3 day games were played.

                          Comment


                          • Re: GLAMMY

                            Originally posted by Hot Shot Hamish. View Post
                            I played a couple of three day games many moons ago and what you said Bob is correct. I remember asking Barry Lloyd if we’re going to try and set the opposition some sort of chase for maybe the final three hour on the final afternoon.He told me that as they had batted for 125 overs and had gone for bowling us out twice going for an innings victory, once we had made the game safe, there was no way that we would declare to give them a sniff. That apparently was the way 3 day games were played.
                            Cheers Hamish, thought I’d read something about it ages ago.

                            Comment


                            • Re: GLAMMY

                              Originally posted by Hot Shot Hamish. View Post
                              I played a couple of three day games many moons ago and what you said Bob is correct. I remember asking Barry Lloyd if we’re going to try and set the opposition some sort of chase for maybe the final three hour on the final afternoon.He told me that as they had batted for 125 overs and had gone for bowling us out twice going for an innings victory, once we had made the game safe, there was no way that we would declare to give them a sniff. That apparently was the way 3 day games were played.
                              thanks good to hear things like this

                              Comment


                              • Re: GLAMMY

                                Labuschagne and Neser (who’s not been named in Australia’s squad for their first three tests of the summer) return to the Glamorgan squad for tomorrow’s match with Durham. The forecast is not bad for the first and last days, but not great for Friday and not much better on Saturday.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X