The Donald Trump thread

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Do yourself a favour, just take the spade out of your hands!

Obviously logic is not your strongest point, let's hope you can do a bit better when next distraction conversation pops up

PS The OIG report is coming out soon, so expect plenty of distractions to be put forward by the MSM

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

So rape only occurs if it is ever proven in a court of law?

It's best to only call someone a rapist if it's been proven in a court of law.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

It's best to only call someone a rapist if it's been proven in a court of law.

I will pass on your advice ..

https://www.amazon.com/Youd-Better-Put-Some-That/dp/1979834245

[the other bob wilson]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I will pass on your advice ..

https://www.amazon.com/Youd-Better-P.../dp/1979834245

Still on that fence?

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I will pass on your advice ..

https://www.amazon.com/Youd-Better-P.../dp/1979834245

Lots of money, could that be a possible motive?

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Lots of money, could that be a possible motive?

Or a ploy to get sued in court, but the accusation went unchallenged

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Or a ploy to get sued in court, but the accusation went unchallenged

For someone self-certifying as a high priest of logic your exposed flank management doesn't get any better with practice!

https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/donald-trump-vows-to-sue-his-accusers-as-yet-another-woman-comes-forward-7916242

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

For someone self-certifying as a high priest of logic your exposed flank management doesn't get any better with practice!

https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news...orward-7916242

It was a well-known fact that you never took on the Clintons during thier days of power, but out of all the politicised sexual abuse cases Broaddrick's is the strongest, so why are you lot against her and all for Stormy? I:m sure it hasn't:t escaped your attention that the case was consensual (if what is alledged took place).

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

It was a well-known fact that you never took on the Clintons during thier days of power, but out of all the political sexual abuse cases Broaddrick's is the strongest, so why are you lot against her and all for Stormy?

Stormy is not a sexual abuse case as you know rather an attempt to cover up an embarrassing story of infidelity prior to the election and continued lies and contradictions as facts emerged after it.

You are tying yourself in knots trying to justify a contradictory position. Feel free to carry on it's entertaining.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Stormy is not a sexual abuse case as you know rather an attempt to cover up an embarrassing story of infidelity prior to the election and continued lies and contradictions as facts emerged after it.

You are tying yourself in knots trying to justify a contradictory position. Feel free to carry on it's entertaining.

Just looking at the bigger picture

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Democrats' and media's Trump-Russia collusion narrative falls apart

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/27/democrats-and-medias-trump-russia-collusion-narrat/

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

It was a well-known fact that you never took on the Clintons during thier days of power, but out of all the politicised sexual abuse cases Broaddrick's is the strongest, so why are you lot against her and all for Stormy? I:m sure it hasn't:t escaped your attention that the case was consensual (if what is alledged took place).

I'm not against Broaddrick. I'm trying to help you see your hypocrisy. If a woman wrote a book saying Trump raped her but refused to go to court, experience strongly suggests you'd be completely on the other side of the argument.

Unfortunately, you're so determined to be clever and contrary that you don't see how badly you're owning yourself, particularly at the moment. It's great to watch.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I'm not against Broaddrick. I'm trying to help you see your hypocrisy. If a woman wrote a book saying Trump raped her but refused to go to court, experience strongly suggests you'd be completely on the other side of the argument.

Unfortunately, you're so determined to be clever and contrary that you don't see how badly you're owning yourself, particularly at the moment. It's great to watch.

To be honest there are too many political games going on at the moment. Anybody who shows up two weeks before an election is a bit suspect in my opinion, and it seems a better idea to revert to original event for a better understanding of what happened (if there is a historical backstory). Broaddrick's certainly has a case that existed outside of political campaigns, while others just show up during the political season with historical accusations, that were previously unknown. I think you get the picture.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

House GOP sets three FBI interviews in Clinton probe

"House Republicans are preparing to conduct the first interviews in more than four months in their investigation into the FBI’s handling of the Hillary Clinton email probe.

A joint investigation run by the Judiciary and the Oversight and Government Reform committees has set three witness interviews for June, including testimony from Bill Priestap, the assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, and Michael Steinbach, the former head of the FBI’s national security division.

Multiple congressional sources confirmed Priestap’s interview. Steinbach confirmed to The Hill that he would be appearing.

The third witness is John Giacalone, who preceded Steinbach as the bureau's top national security official and oversaw the first seven months of the Clinton probe, according to multiple congressional sources."

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/389189-house-gop-sets-three-fbi-interviews-in-clinton-probe