If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The Times article, stating that one in three British pupils are now from an ethnic minority has nothing to do with Professor Coleman. I'm not interested in his politics and smears using emotive language, just the data and science, i thought as an academic you'd appreciate that.
If current population trends continue the native Brirish people will be extinct. There is no reason to think current trends won't continue.
Aren't the original natives of what is currently the British Isles already extinct due to various invasions and immigration from Scandinavia, mainland Europe etc? Or are you trying to say that if current trends continue Britain won't be primarily white?
Or, what is wrong with France? Or the numerous other safe countries travelled through.
It's ultra difficult to describe them as refugees who are fleeing terror, as some have in this thread, when they are stood on the Calais shoreline clutching their copy of A Dummy's Guide to Claiming UK Benefits.
It's ultra difficult to describe them as refugees who are fleeing terror, as some have in this thread, when they are stood on the Calais shoreline clutching their copy of A Dummy's Guide to Claiming UK Benefits.
Oh great, Morg's in. Looks like someone has nabbed his ASDA delivery slot and he's lashing out in all directions.
It's ultra difficult to describe them as refugees who are fleeing terror, as some have in this thread, when they are stood on the Calais shoreline clutching their copy of A Dummy's Guide to Claiming UK Benefits.
I did listen to an actual interview of one asylum seeker from Afghanistan he said he joining his family, which us nice and a worry , if you assume each one arriving is to join a family , or the family will follow each new arrival times that by 4 multiplied by the 30k average for say next 10 years all will need support, housing , education etc etc , most will find themselves in the poorer parts of the UK already under severe social pressures it does make one think what is the solution....
You can bet your NIMBY's , Champagne Socialist won't be offering up any rooms as per the Ukraine white refugees ???
And folk think it's just the Tories who are racist 🤔 or the like that slight of hand deflection..
Hopefully the new social caring footballers can sort this one out by giving up some of thier land or mansions for these refugees , they do a lot of heartfelt (gesturing ) for other well deserved causes.
I did listen to an actual interview of one asylum seeker from Afghanistan he said he joining his family, which us nice and a worry , if you assume each one arriving is to join a family , or the family will follow each new arrival times that by 4 multiplied by the 30k average for say next 10 years all will need support, housing , education etc etc , most will find themselves in the poorer parts of the UK already under severe social pressures it does make one think what is the solution....
You can bet your NIMBY's , Champagne Socialist won't be offering up any rooms as per the Ukraine white refugees ???
And folk think it's just the Tories who are racist 🤔 or the like that slight of hand deflection..
Hopefully the new social caring footballers can sort this one out by giving up some of thier land or mansions for these refugees , they do a lot of heartfelt (gesturing ) for other well deserved causes.
Personally, I would just let asylum seekers work.
I presume you do know practically every study conducted shows immigrants are net contributors to the economy they join.
It's ultra difficult to describe them as refugees who are fleeing terror, as some have in this thread, when they are stood on the Calais shoreline clutching their copy of A Dummy's Guide to Claiming UK Benefits.
The Times article, stating that one in three British pupils are now from an ethnic minority has nothing to do with Professor Coleman. I'm not interested in his politics and smears using emotive language, just the data and science, i thought as an academic you'd appreciate that.
If current population trends continue the native Brirish people will be extinct. There is no reason to think current trends won't continue.
It doesn't state what someone who is in an ethnic minority is - I've heard a few different definitions as it is. I'm guessing we're talking about anyone who isn't a white British born Christian. So what? As I've said (and as you've ignored on several occasions) that most people of an ethnic minority try and fit in with British life, apart from religiously. Then again, most Brits aren't bothered about religion any more. There are lots of African immigrants who are Christians and are church goers, often more regularly than British people. One of the Church of England's leading Archbishops (until recently) was African.
There is no conclusive evidence to show that Brirish people will be extinct. Extrapolating data, as Coleman has done, over such a long time frame is very unusual and very unreliable. I wonder why he chose 2066 when he could have chosen any year? 1966 World Cup. 1066 Battle of Hastings. All designed to stir national passion. If I found an immigration report denouncing Coleman's as bollocks from a pro-immigration professor, you'd be attacking it from every angle and don't deny that you wouldn't.
Simple question for you. Yes or no. Do you believe Britain should primarily be only for white, British people?
It doesn't state what someone who is in an ethnic minority is - I've heard a few different definitions as it is. I'm guessing we're talking about anyone who isn't a white British born Christian. So what? As I've said (and as you've ignored on several occasions) that most people of an ethnic minority try and fit in with British life, apart from religiously. Then again, most Brits aren't bothered about religion any more. There are lots of African immigrants who are Christians and are church goers, often more regularly than British people. One of the Church of England's leading Archbishops (until recently) was African.
There is no conclusive evidence to show that Brirish people will be extinct. Extrapolating data, as Coleman has done, over such a long time frame is very unusual and very unreliable. I wonder why he chose 2066 when he could have chosen any year? 1966 World Cup. 1066 Battle of Hastings. All designed to stir national passion. If I found an immigration report denouncing Coleman's as bollocks from a pro-immigration professor, you'd be attacking it from every angle and don't deny that you wouldn't.
Simple question for you. Yes or no. Do you believe Britain should primarily be only for white, British people?
It does say what an ethnic minority is on the link provided. Here is an exert: "Those pupils of compulsory school age and above who have been classified according to their ethnic group and are other than White British are defined as being of minority ethnic origin"
It also says that now one in Five pupils have English as a Second language.
I have to say Eric, You're dangersly entering into the realms of sophistry and obfuscation by trying to deny the glaringly obvious European population change caused by mass immigration from the 3rd world. Perhaps you live in the country side and don't take in much Television. Why are you so reluctant to admit what's going on and embrace it? if they are your beliefs.
The current trends predict that native Brits will become extinct. Mass immigration has continued for decades. If you think the status quo will cease, then the burden is on you to explain how. It's pie in the sky thinking to believe that mass immigration will be halted or reversed. If you have a solid prediction of change, share it with me.
Ofcourse i think that Britain should primarily for the native British, in the same way Africa should be primarily for Africans. Do you think Africa should primarily be for Africans?
I feel you're trying to trap me into appearing like an extremist so you can ban me. Because people don't like uncomfortable facts and free speech. Away from this message board the majority of people dislike mass immigration. if a referendum were ever held on whether to stop mass immigration. It would be a landslide victory to stop it. Which is why a referendum will never happen. To me that is a disgrace. Mass immigration benefits big business and surpresses workers wage. In my view The Brexit vote was in part an expression of mass immigration dissatisfaction.
Comment