GLAMMY

[Park Life]

Re: GLAMMY

Stevens is going to get yet another century against us. Once again we struggle to finish off the opposition. From 92/7 to 182/8 and counting

Fair play to Stevens incredible knock, currently 126 not out - age no barrier, think he’s 45 years old now

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

I can't believe this. We should have been batting for an hour now. So frustrating

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Braindead bowling. Stevens is a remarkable cricketer but this has been dire in the field.

[Dave Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

There is no excuse for this. It’s beyond incompetent.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

This has been unprofessional and Maynard needs to read the riot act. To not even make their number ten even have to play a shot for ball after ball is unacceptable. This afternoon session has been humiliating

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

On the positive side. Full bowling points, and the Canterbury pitch has been a good batting surface this year.

But after that onslaught, I do worry about a collapse from us

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

I’d rather give credit to a brilliant innings by a remarkable cricketer.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Labuschagne out to Stevens again with another low score. His poor form is becoming a concern.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Looked like a shocker of a decision mind. Shame as he'd looked very bright.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Looked like a shocker of a decision mind. Shame as he'd looked very bright.

It looked like it was missing off stump. Perhaps it came back in a bit

[Majorblue]

Re: GLAMMY

If anything summed up Glammy this day does.
Credit to the cricketing oap though as a quite remarkable knock.

[Kind of Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

Fairplay to Stevens, not a shabby day’s play at all for the old timer. Couldn’t believe when I checked the score at around three o’clock after where the game was at lunch.

Awful conditions to play in mind.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Got on for an hour or so. it looks like Lloyd got out lbw pretty quickly. Caught a few overs online at the end. Carlson again did well if you ignore the last over where he played and missed at all 5 bouncers sent down, only scoring off the last. He finished on 88 not out.

I meant to reply to this message about a week ago, but forgot and only came on to it again just now - I reckon Carlson played that over like he did because he knew the captains had agreed it was going to be the last one.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

He’s not scored many, but well done to Joe Cooke for batting a long time in very trying conditions- Glamorgan 55-2.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

No play yet, no wonder this is on track to be the wettest May on record to follow on from the coldest April on record.

Just watched the Labuschagne dismissal - looked a dreadful decision, but I think he could be in trouble for seeming to argue with the umpire after he was given out.