GLAMMY

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

It usually takes him until about July to get to seven wickets for the season

127-4. Just 22 behind! Decent stand but these 2 need to keep going. Lose 1..........

[Madassa]

Re: GLAMMY

127-4. Just 22 behind! Decent stand but these 2 need to keep going. Lose 1..........

A comfortable draw on the end but typically made us sweat at 66/4 😰

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

The prediction column which had us finishing third I mentioned earlier had Notts, who we play this week, finishing top and Durham second, so it’s a testing start for us and we could do with having our two Australian players available for Trent Bridge.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

One important point to mention. Is that Alex Lees innings was essentially the difference between the sides. He was absolutely plumb lbw twice early Saturday morning, but neither were given. Was struggling to lay bat on ball for the first hour of his innings. Obviously huge credit to him for digging in, but we could have very easily been right in the game if he had been given.

[TWGL1]

Re: GLAMMY

Marnus …

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/61070118

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Marnus …

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/61070118

Can't wait to see him back in the glamorgan side. Unbelievable player !!

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Marnus back today! Ingram dropped from squad which must mean Neser is fit aswell. Looks like no Broad in the notts side either. Glamorgan 12/5 to win, draw no bet. Looks a tasty price to me

[MacAdder]

Re: GLAMMY

Marnus back today! Ingram dropped from squad which must mean Neser is fit aswell. Looks like no Broad in the notts side either. Glamorgan 12/5 to win, draw no bet. Looks a tasty price to me

Yes but this is Glamorgan.

That 12/5 odds could easily be our first innings score!

Seriously though, it would be nice to get off to a flier, especially with those two class performers.
The team performs so much better when there is something to play for.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

They put Notts in to bat on what looks a very green pitch, but the home side are going along at nearly five an over - 67-1 so far.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Yes but this is Glamorgan.

That 12/5 odds could easily be our first innings score!

Seriously though, it would be nice to get off to a flier, especially with those two class performers.
The team performs so much better when there is something to play for.

Very true ! Hopefully this year is the year it all changes !

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

How quickly a game can change! Notts looked like they were starting to get away from us there. 2 quick wickets and they're 264 for 6

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Two wickets for Labuschagne bowling medium pace - actually, he looks a bit quicker than that!

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Great day in the end. Certainly wasn't expecting that about midway through the afternoon session. From Notts at 240 odd for 4 with 2 batsman scoring quickly. End up 270 runs behind with all 10 wickets left.

Credit to Salter and Lloyd aswell. It's hard to make a statement in 5 overs at the end of the day, but they've done it.

[Seabird]

Re: GLAMMY

Just don't chuck it away this morning.

[poc]

Re: GLAMMY

good solid start again this morning needed