GLAMMY

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

Anyone know if semi on TV.

[Loramski]

Re: GLAMMY

Anyone know if semi on TV.

Can't see anything. The Hundred finals are on Sunday too so we'll be lucky if it even gets a mention.

11.00 at Sophia Gardens against the winner of Worcestershire v Warwickshire. Weather forecast looks good for now.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Great result. Van Der gugten and Mcillroy bowled brilliantly. Thought the figures lied a bit for Kellaway and douthwaite. Kellaway will take it, douthwaite will bounce back!

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

Can't see anything. The Hundred finals are on Sunday too so we'll be lucky if it even gets a mention.

11.00 at Sophia Gardens against the winner of Worcestershire v Warwickshire. Weather forecast looks good for now.

Wikipedia had glammy playing the winner of the Leicester semi about an hour ago. Not sure which we’d prefer?

[Dave Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

Wikipedia had glammy playing the winner of the Leicester semi about an hour ago. Not sure which we’d prefer?

I read it Warwick or Worc.

[Dave Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

So many permutations today. All worked out in the end. Good day and win. Well done to Welsh Fire women as well, especially after the disappointment of last year. Men did well today but second time rain has foiled a certain win this year.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

That was a very good win. It looked iffy at 165/8 so to get to 230 was a good effort. Once again Van Der Gugten bowled superbly and in the end a comfortable win.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

That was a very good win. It looked iffy at 165/8 so to get to 230 was a good effort. Once again Van Der Gugten bowled superbly and in the end a comfortable win.

I’m gradually coming around to thinking Van Der Gugten has become a superb county cricketer - he seems to be getting better, he’s become a dependable batsman in a crisis for a start.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

So many permutations today. All worked out in the end. Good day and win. Well done to Welsh Fire women as well, especially after the disappointment of last year. Men did well today but second time rain has foiled a certain win this year.

I’ve been thinking the Welsh Fire men’s team had become almost as bad as they were a couple of years ago, but the truth is they were well on their way to winning the two games that were rained off and their season would have looked a lot different with those extra points.

[Dave Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

I’ve been thinking the Welsh Fire men’s team had become almost as bad as they were a couple of years ago, but the truth is they were well on their way to winning the two games that were rained off and their season would have looked a lot different with those extra points.

Yes would have been 50/50. Interestingly, those extra 2 points would not have made any difference to any league place in the men’s league.

[Loramski]

Re: GLAMMY

I'm sure I heard a commentator say the other day that Welsh Fire men's team have won 4 home games out of 16 over the four years of the Hundred. Us City fans don't know how lucky we are.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

I'm sure I heard a commentator say the other day that Welsh Fire men's team have won 4 home games out of 16 over the four years of the Hundred. Us City fans don't know how lucky we are.

Without checking it, that sounds about right to me.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

I’m gradually coming around to thinking Van Der Gugten has become a superb county cricketer - he seems to be getting better, he’s become a dependable batsman in a crisis for a start.

Yep his bowling and batting improve every season. He has turned into an impressive long term signing.

[Loramski]

Re: GLAMMY

I read it Warwick or Worc.

Warwickshire it is. Chased down 286 from 77-5 today, some teenager from the UAE got 130.

[az city]

Re: GLAMMY

Warwickshire it is. Chased down 286 from 77-5 today, some teenager from the UAE got 130.

It's kind of right Glammy should play Warks for a place in the final after the NR earlier.