Coronavirus update - NO MORE RESTRICTIONS

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Coronavirus update

https://twitter.com/lloydhardy/statu...678411778?s=19

this will be interesting

Interesting yet I bet we won’t hear a peep about it in most of the papers.

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Coronavirus update

https://twitter.com/lloydhardy/statu...678411778?s=19

this will be interesting

If it's true of course

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Coronavirus update

Interesting yet I bet we won’t hear a peep about it in most of the papers.

If it is a load of junk probably not.

Presumably the National Audit office will have something to say if any of it is true.

Or are Government Audits done by blokes on twitter these days?

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Coronavirus update

Tory defence squad to the rescue! I voted for them so have to defend everything they do 🎺

[Rjk]

Re: Coronavirus update

Interesting yet I bet we won’t hear a peep about it in most of the papers.

yet if it had been Corbyn it would have been open season

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Coronavirus update

Tory defence squad to the rescue! I voted for them so have to defend everything they do ��

And where O wise one was I defending them.


Certainly the items are on the spreadsheets but Lloyd Hardy, you, or I won't have access to the documentation saying exactly what the items are for.

The National Audit Office can see everything, so unless you are accusing them of dishonesty (perhaps you are) as well they will report anything dubious about them. They certainly haven't been hidden!!

I've no idea if SP means Secretary Patel either . I suspect he doesn't either.

And when someone queries one of the entries because it is from Poundland and isn't expressed in round pounds you have to wonder!


If there has been fraud and the audit office find it then Priti Patel or whoever in her office has done it should be in trouble.

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Coronavirus update

Doot doot 🎺🎺

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Coronavirus update

Doot doot 🎺🎺

Pray tell how my post defended the Government???????

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Coronavirus update

yet if it had been Corbyn it would have been open season

My dislike of Jeremy Corbyn is well known on this board.

But to be fair to him I don't think he would have been in this position because I think he is pretty honest in his financial dealings.

[Rjk]

Re: Coronavirus update

My dislike of Jeremy Corbyn is well known on this board.

But to be fair to him I don't think he would have been in this position because I think he is pretty honest in his financial dealings.

the implication being....

[Tuerto]

Re: Coronavirus update

Tory defence squad to the rescue! I voted for them so have to defend everything they do ��

I'm not saying for a second that the figures are accurate, truthful or real. I do hope they are though. As for Tories defending her because they voted for them, nah, that's not the case, it isn't blind loyalty, that can be understood to a certain degree. They defend because they think it's ok to commit a bit of fraud at the expense of the public. Look how old boris has behaved, shagger, liar, incompetent, abandons his kids etc. It's an odd one, that's for sure-Could you imagine those behavior traits if that was some working class bloke on benefits? I'm sure he wouldn't receive the backing of the Daily Mail or of the millions of Tories up and down the nation, or even Elwood Blues

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Coronavirus update

the implication being....

The implication being......nothing


What did you think I was implying?

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Coronavirus update

I'm not saying for a second that the figures are accurate, truthful or real. I do hope they are though. As for Tories defending her because they voted for them, nah, that's not the case, it isn't blind loyalty, that can be understood to a certain degree. They defend because they think it's ok to commit a bit of fraud at the expense of the public. Look how old boris has behaved, shagger, liar, incompetent, abandons his kids etc. It's an odd one, that's for sure-Could you imagine those behavior traits if that was some working class bloke on benefits? I'm sure he wouldn't receive the backing of the Daily Mail or of the millions of Tories up and down the nation, or even Elwood Blues

Having just seen the last bit referring to me I am actually quite angry at this.

You are,in the bit in bold, (which is the hell of an over exaggeration about all conservative voter anyway) insinuating that I am dishonest basically because you still seem to feel that I am defending the Tories here and don't try and defend yourself by saying 'Oh I put on a laughter emoji' There are times when that excuse doesn't wash.

As I said if you can be bothered to read my post I said

'If there has been fraud and the audit office find it then Priti Patel or whoever in her office has done it should be in trouble.'

So if she has committed fraud she should be for it. But not on the basis of assumptions by the Twitteratti.



And I thought you were a pretty decent poster even though we have different views in politics.

Not as good a judge of character as I thought.

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Coronavirus update

🎺

[Elwood Blues]

Re: Coronavirus update

��

where's the V sign smiley when you need it.......