Coronavirus update - NO MORE RESTRICTIONS

[CCFCC3PO]

Re: Coronavirus update

The stir is where the video's hosted. It has 1.8 million views and attracted 1,800 comments.

Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LP9O...ature=youtu.be

How many of those were commenting purely because a slip of the tongue confirmed their biases?

[CCFCC3PO]

Re: Coronavirus update

Churchill was an even bigger **** than Boris

Spot on.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Coronavirus update

How many of those were commenting purely because a slip of the tongue confirmed their biases?

I have no idea because I haven't read them. You asked why I made the stir remark, I told you but now you want me to speculate on why people made comments. It's easy to see why you get on Gunman's wick.

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Coronavirus update

I have no idea because I haven't read them. You asked why I made the stir remark, I told you but now you want me to speculate on why people made comments. It's easy to see why you get on Gunman's wick.

Maybe it's all a plandemic

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: Coronavirus update

It looks like Morg has accepted one of those social media challenges. You know the type. "Thanks for the nomination I'm going to share one You Tube video per day for 10 consecutive days that best show my philosophical, social and political outlook. No Explanations, just pictures".

[lardy]

Re: Coronavirus update

It looks like Morg has accepted one of those social media challenges. You know the type. "Thanks for the nomination I'm going to share one You Tube video per day for 10 consecutive days that best show my philosophical, social and political outlook. No Explanations, just pictures".

The tinfoil challenge. You could be right about that.

[CCFCC3PO]

Re: Coronavirus update

I have no idea because I haven't read them. You asked why I made the stir remark, I told you but now you want me to speculate on why people made comments. It's easy to see why you get on Gunman's wick.

So, let's get this straight. You've posted a link to a video, but you weren't making any implications nor statements from posting the video. You simply said the video "caused a stir". That is based on it getting 1.8m views and 1800 comments, none of which you have read.

Is it possible, then, that you were throwing in a strawman because your previous argument was getting ripped apart. You've tried it in this post too.

[CCFCC3PO]

Re: Coronavirus update

It looks like Morg has accepted one of those social media challenges. You know the type. "Thanks for the nomination I'm going to share one You Tube video per day for 10 consecutive days that best show my philosophical, social and political outlook. No Explanations, just pictures".

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Coronavirus update

Churchill was an even bigger **** than Boris

I agree to an extent, but I think the point is that, when it came to the Second World War at least, Churchill was the real thing in a way that Boris Johnson is not for the COVID 19 panademic.

[Heisenberg]

Re: Coronavirus update

It looks like Morg has accepted one of those social media challenges. You know the type. "Thanks for the nomination I'm going to share one You Tube video per day for 10 consecutive days that best show my philosophical, social and political outlook. No Explanations, just pictures".

http://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.php?442698-Coronavirus-overhyped-fear-mongering-or-potential-mega-doom&p=5070381&viewfull=1#post5070381

This was his last one, just a week or so ago. It carries on, on the next page.

He never explains why he thinks the things he shares are important and says that the things themselves are what is important. Making no f**king sense whatsoever.

[Hilts]

Re: Coronavirus update

Quarantine now for airline passenger arrivals.
Surely with Boris saying there will be 200,000 tests they can just test them on arrival. Then quarantine if necessary.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Coronavirus update

So, let's get this straight. You've posted a link to a video, but you weren't making any implications nor statements from posting the video. You simply said the video "caused a stir". That is based on it getting 1.8m views and 1800 comments, none of which you have read.

Is it possible, then, that you were throwing in a strawman because your previous argument was getting ripped apart. You've tried it in this post too.

1.8 million views in 10 days plus 1,800 comments qualifies as 'quite a stir' to me.

This is the latest from the BBC:-

UK 'to bring in 14-day quarantine' for air passengers - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52594023

[CCFCC3PO]

Re: Coronavirus update

1.8 million views in 10 days plus 1,800 comments qualifies as 'quite a stir' to me.

This is the latest from the BBC:-

UK 'to bring in 14-day quarantine' for air passengers - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52594023

Right, in your next post you are going to explain how these two stories are linked. Otherwise, it's another illustration of you being unable to commit to one line of thought. I am, at the moment, unable to work out if you have many lines of thought, or zero.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Coronavirus update

Maybe it's all a plandemic

It's Mr Exponential. I'm wondering why there's not millions or billions of COVID-19 dead by now.

[blue matt]

Re: Coronavirus update

Quarantine now for airline passenger arrivals.
Surely with Boris saying there will be 200,000 tests they can just test them on arrival. Then quarantine if necessary.

they think incubation period is a few days, so they might have come into contact in the departure airport, if we tested them on arrival they would still be negative