GLAMMY

[insider]

Re: GLAMMY

That bowling performance was utter gash.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

There's a huge silver lining, which is that every other game went our way. So we're actually in a slightly better position than we were at start of play. But how have we thrown that one away. No balls, silly wides, we didn't even make them beat us at times, just completely threw it away!

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

150 off the last 10. Bloody hell. Somehow they have to bounce back for Sunday

[Don Corleone]

Re: GLAMMY

That was a ridiculous defeat even by glamorgans standards !

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Hopefully Timm comes back in for MciIlroy. I'd be putting Crane back in for Gorvin if the pitch shows any hint of spin aswell.

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

Hopefully Timm comes back in for MciIlroy. I'd be putting Crane back in for Gorvin if the pitch shows any hint of spin aswell.

Really missed crane. Is he fit?

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Really missed crane. Is he fit?

I'm not sure. The Glamorgan website doesn't even seem to do a match preview before games now. Some comments on Facebook seem to suggest Timmy and Crane are being rested/not picked rather than injured.

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

that's 2 games we have lost to Surrey which we should have won. why didn't Kellaway bowl tonight? don't know who is in the squad or what the contract terms are but there's a lot of crap to flush out for sure.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

I'm not sure. The Glamorgan website doesn't even seem to do a match preview before games now. Some comments on Facebook seem to suggest Timmy and Crane are being rested/not picked rather than injured.

Crane was named in the original team I think and was replaced by McIlroy just before “kick off”, I’ve not seen a reason as to why.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Crane was named in the original team I think and was replaced by McIlroy just before “kick off”, I’ve not seen a reason as to why.

That's a shame, he may well have made the difference

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan in trouble against their former bowler DeLange chasing 170 odd to win.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Another very poor performance. Its turning into a typical Glammy T20 campaign.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Another very poor performance. Its turning into a typical Glammy T20 campaign.

Yes, I’ve not been too critical of some of Glamorgan’s losses to teams like Surrey and Hampshire, but that was poor today - something of a bottle job I’m afraid.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Poor in the field, and fell apart with the bat. Glos did have lady luck with them today though. Every six they hit seemed to drop just over the boundary, and winning the toss in that heat was a big bonus.

Looks like Sussex, the team that has hammered us twice may well finish below us, while the Kent side we made look like amateurs will take our top 4 spot from us.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Yes, IÂ’ve not been too critical of some of GlamorganÂ’s losses to teams like Surrey and Hampshire, but that was poor today - something of a bottle job IÂ’m afraid.

I think Cooke needs to come back in for Horton. Ingram moved up to three in the order. Drop Kellaway down to six.