Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GLAMMY

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: GLAMMY

    Fernando 29 overs 6-70 in match. Well done!

    Comment


    • Re: GLAMMY

      Glammy doing a C4rdf ffs!

      Comment


      • Re: GLAMMY

        Glad they played to a finish tonight. A bit of common sense in cricket for once. Back to back 3 day wins. Onwards and upwards!

        Comment


        • Re: GLAMMY

          Decent chance that Gloucestershire and Lancashire could win their first games today,d but, even if Derbyshire lose at Old Trafford, they’ll go above us. Apart from Leicestershire at the top, it’s shaping up as a real even division.

          Comment


          • Re: GLAMMY

            the commentary in the extra half hour was class think it was edward bevan

            Comment


            • Re: GLAMMY

              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
              Decent chance that Gloucestershire and Lancashire could win their first games today,d but, even if Derbyshire lose at Old Trafford, they’ll go above us. Apart from Leicestershire at the top, it’s shaping up as a real even division.
              Thought it was a bit cheeky of Glamorgan to publish the table last night with us in 2nd, even though Derby already had enough bonus points to put them above us 😊

              Comment


              • Re: GLAMMY

                Good to see us bowling more effectively as a seaming unit, as opposed to over-relying on van de Gugten (as has often been the case in recent years). We now look very capable of taking 20 wickets each week regardless of the wicket, which wasn't the case at all in the first three games. Great to see Tribe and ul Hussain taking a bit of pressure off the top/middle order, too (I think ul Hussain's last three dismissals - especially last night - have either been unlucky or unplayable, whereas he was throwing his wicket away earlier in the season).

                I'd be interested to know what's shifted in the dressing room mentality-wise, because something clearly has. As well as the improvement with bat and ball, they're much tighter and more urgent in the field. You can't help but feel Carlson's excellent slip catch yesterday would have been put down four or five weeks ago.

                The only downer was Marnus' damp squib. If he was staying here longer, you could make the case that a warm-up knock with the seconds would have been a wiser idea this week, although luckily it didn't cost us. I'm not even sure you can say he's dusted the cobwebs off because he only faced 10 or so balls, but hopefully he makes up for it against Middlesex.

                Comment


                • Re: GLAMMY

                  Gloucestershire win and Derbyshire hang on for a draw at Lancashire with eight wickets down.

                  Lancashire’s failure to get those last two wickets means their ten points in front of us. Gloucestershire join us on 75 points.

                  Comment


                  • Re: GLAMMY

                    No Kellaway or Fernando for today’s final red ball game for a while against bogey team Middlesex - we’ve got a new overseas signing for just this match.

                    Comment


                    • Re: GLAMMY

                      Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                      No Kellaway or Fernando for today’s final red ball game for a while against bogey team Middlesex - we’ve got a new overseas signing for just this match.

                      https://glamorgancricket.com/news/gl...-preview-squad
                      I hope I am proved wrong, but personally I’d have much preferred mason crane in the starting 11. Bloody exams - couldn’t kellaway have got a 5 day extension!! He is our in form man. One other thing, have we won a toss this season…

                      Comment


                      • Re: GLAMMY

                        Originally posted by Lord Worcester View Post
                        I hope I am proved wrong, but personally I’d have much preferred mason crane in the starting 11. Bloody exams - couldn’t kellaway have got a 5 day extension!! He is our in form man. One other thing, have we won a toss this season…
                        I make it one toss out of seven we’ve won (at Bristol, we put Gloucestershire in and they scored 500+). If the Cardiff pitch plays true to form, we’ll concede a first innings lead of about 200 +.

                        Don’t like the look of the side either, surely one of Crane or Leonard should be starting?

                        Comment


                        • Re: GLAMMY

                          Why did we drop Ingram for marnus

                          Comment


                          • Re: GLAMMY

                            Originally posted by Lord Worcester View Post
                            Why did we drop Ingram for marnus
                            it was planned apparently

                            Comment


                            • Re: GLAMMY

                              Originally posted by poc View Post
                              it was planned apparently
                              Then it should have been unplanned! Ingram was in superb form and Marcus has scored nothing in 3. 1 to go.

                              Comment


                              • Re: GLAMMY

                                71-3 at lunch, typical first day stuff at Sophia Gardens with the ball on top - unless you mess the decision up like Northants did last week, you really need to win the toss to stand the best chance of winning.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X